Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Reedy and Janice Reedy

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2002No. 01-11042PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Thomas and Janice Reedy appeal their convictions of, and sentences for, transporting “visual depictions” of “minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252, and transporting “child pornography,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. Websites specializing in child pornography paid the Reedys a portion of their profits to establish a sign-on, screening, and age verification system for subscribers.

The government agrees that the district court imposed multiplicitous sentences by counting each image posted as a violation of two statutes…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. United States v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API