Legal Opinion

Bell v. Union Carbide Corp.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 26, 1984No. CIV. 3-84-120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.

In this cause of action, plaintiff alleges that defendant engaged in a campaign to force him to quit his job, which conduct constituted intentional infliction of emotional distress and deprivation of contractual rights. This case was removed from state court by defendant and jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. The ease is now before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff was employed by Union Carbide Corporation (hereafter defendant or the Company) under a collective bargaining agreement. The collective…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Smith v. CAPITOL MFG. CO., a DIV. OF HARSCO CORP.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  3. Nancy Kay Curry v. Great Lakes Steel DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API