Legal Opinion

Flohr v. United States

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1957No. Civ. No. 6372Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

Although not alleged with the desired accuracy, it is apparent that plaintiff bases her action upon the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1346(b) and related sections, all of which are familiarly known as the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The complaint in substance charges that on the 9th day of December 1955, the plaintiff, a citizen of Poland, •sustained bodily injuries through the negligence of the agents of the defendant while she was a passenger upon the ■vessel known as the General W. C. Langfitt. She seeks a money judgment. The allegations are sufficient to show that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Agwilines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. The U. S. Army LST 34District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API