Legal Opinion

Brockway v. Blair

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1917No. 3,768PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Yellowstone County; Geo. W. Pierson, Judge. Action by B. G-. Broekway against H. B. Blair. ’Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals from it and from an order denying him a new trial. Unquestionably the parties in the contract in question intended to say, and did say, that unless the plaintiff made the sale he was not entitled to a commission.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Yellowstone County; Geo. W. Pierson, Judge. Action by B. G-. Broekway against H. B. Blair. ’Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals from it and from an order denying him a new trial. Unquestionably the parties in the contract in question intended to say, and did say, that unless the plaintiff made the sale he was not entitled to a commission. While we do not contend that the delivery of a ear would be necessary to constitute such a sale as would entitle plaintiff to his commission, yet we do assert that the plaintiff would be required to make such a contract…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover commissions alleged to be due upon the sale of three automobiles, under the following written agreement:

“This agreement made and entered into this 5th day of May, 1913, by and between H. B. Blair, of Livingston, and B, G. *534Brockway, of Billings, Montana, as follows: The said first party agrees to furnish Reo automobiles for the said second party to sell in Yellowstone and Carbon counties in the following manner: The said second party to get fifteen per cent (15) of sales. Said first party to furnish all automobiles on deposit of one hundred dollars…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ElliottMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Ming v. PrattMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Shober v. BlackfordMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Quirk v. RichMontana Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cornner v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Surman v. CruseMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hill Cattle Corporation v. KillornMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. McConnell v. BlackleyMontana Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API