Legal Opinion

New York Central Railroad v. Clark

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 17, 1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Book Account. Heard on plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s pleas at the April Term, 1917, Windham County, Waterman, J., presiding. Judgment, overruling the demurrers and adjudging the pleas sufficient.- Plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is an action of contract. The defendant filed four pleas by way of an answer. To these pleas severally the plaintiff demurred. The trial court overruled the demurrers, adjudged the defendant’s pleas sufficient, and, exceptions being taken, passed the cause to this Court before final judgment. The plaintiff seeks its remedy by an action of book account, using the brief and simple language of the time-honored form provided by statute, a form, which because of its brevity, simplicity and comprehensiveness, conforms both in letter and in spirit to the requirements of the Practice Act.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hall v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
  2. Lapham v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  3. Alexander v. School District No. 6.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  4. Aseltine v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  5. Currier v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BisselSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. State v. BissellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. In Re RipleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Howard National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API