Legal Opinion

Parisi v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 6, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company appeals from a summary judgment adjudicating its liability, by way of declaratory judgment, to pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to plaintiff Karen Metakes Parisi. We conclude that the trial judge was correct in rejecting Aetna’s statute of limitations defense, and, accordingly, we affirm.

The novel issue before us requires us to determine when the cause of action accrues against a PIP carrier that is not primarily liable. Analogizing to excess insurance, we are satisfied that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Martin v. Prudential Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Arico v. Township of BrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Santeez v. State Farm Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Anne Onyeneho v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Britten v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Auguste v. SearsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API