Parisi v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.
Defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company appeals from a summary judgment adjudicating its liability, by way of declaratory judgment, to pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to plaintiff Karen Metakes Parisi. We conclude that the trial judge was correct in rejecting Aetna’s statute of limitations defense, and, accordingly, we affirm.
The novel issue before us requires us to determine when the cause of action accrues against a PIP carrier that is not primarily liable. Analogizing to excess insurance, we are satisfied that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martin v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Martin v. Prudential Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Arico v. Township of BrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Santeez v. State Farm Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Anne Onyeneho v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Britten v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Auguste v. SearsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999