Legal Opinion

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Law Office of Robert Jay Gumenick, P.C.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 2010No. 08 Civ. 2154 (VM)Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

At the Court’s telephonic conference on May 11, 2010 with the parties to this action, defendants Law Office of Robert Jay Gumenick, P.C. and Robert Jay Gumenick (collectively, “Gumenick Defendants”) requested leave to file a motion for summary judgment on plaintiff J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“JP Morgan”) legal malpractice claims arising out of a mortgage transaction known as the Hartford Loan (the “Hartford Loan”). The Court directed the parties to submit letter-briefs addressing factual and legal issues raised by Gumenick Defendants’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & StolarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Protective Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
Alphonso Samuels v. J. Mockry, G. Hewston, W. Higgins and J. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.