Legal Opinion

State v. Knight

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2006No. 03023540C; A122440PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

A jury convicted defendant of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and unlawful sexual penetration in the second degree, ORS 163.408. Defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in allowing the state to play for the jury a recording of a telephone conversation in which defendant made several very disparaging remarks about his attorney. He argues that the recording was irrelevant, that any probative value it may have had was outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, and that allowing the jury to hear the recording violated his constitutional right to counsel. We reject…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. JohanesenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mid-Century Insurance v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API