State v. Salazar
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.
David Salazar appeals his conviction for criminal nonsupport under section 568.040.1 The conviction was premised upon a finding that Salazar failed to provide adequate support “for his child.” Section 568.040.1 The term “child” includes “any child legitimated by legal process.” Section 568.04,0.2(1). The circuit court held that a default administrative order issued by the division of child support enforcement (DCSE) and docketed with the circuit court constituted legitimization by legal process. The default administrative order does not constitute legitimatization…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GrubbSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State v. HobokinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Hilburn v. StaedenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Sanders v. SauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Wilson v. CramerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Morse v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- DeWitt v. LechugaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. OltenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.