Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKSON, J.

In the case of Hammond v. City of Charlotte, the plaintiff recovered judgment against the city of Charlotte for $35,032.25. In the Elliott case, for $51,881.77; in the Brown case for $3,188.86, a total recovery of $90,102.88. In the Hammond case, supra, 205 N. C., 469, the defendant city of Charlotte appealed to this Court, we affirmed the judgment appealed from, as a valid and binding obligation of the city of Charlotte. The plaintiffs were employed by the school commissioners as principals, teachers and in other capacities for the year 1932-1933, in conformance with the school law. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norment v. . City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Hammond v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Bolich v. . City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mebane Graded School District v. County of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Casualty Co. v. . Comrs. of SaludaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Dry v. Board of Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API