Legal Opinion

Trager v. Schwartz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 1, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

This is the bill in equity as to which we have today held that a petition by the plaintiff for leave to appeal late under G-. L. c. 214, § 28, as amended by St. 1960, c. 207, § 2, from a final decree was properly allowed. Ante, p. 650. The final decree ordered and adjudged that the bill of complaint be dismissed as to the plaintiff; that the defendant John Trager is the owner of sixty-five shares of the capital stock of the defendant Northeastern-Maiden Barrel Co., Inc. (Barrel); and that the defendant Barrel make record that the defendant John Trager is the owner of the shares. The evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samia v. Central Oil Co. of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Phelps v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Markham, etc v. FayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Tomaino v. Concord Oil of Newport, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. Fogelin v. NordblomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Riley v. Tougas (In Re Tougas)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  5. Diamond v. PappathanasiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API