Legal Opinion

Tomaino v. Concord Oil of Newport, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 25, 1998No. 95-684-AppealPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Chief Justice.

This case comes to us on cross-appeals from a judgment entered in Superior Court. The plaintiffs’ complaint sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and money damages on the issue of ownership of certain underground gasoline tanks located on three separate parcels of land owned by the plaintiff Joseph M. Tomaino (Tomaino or plaintiff). 1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part. The facts insofar as are pertinent to the instant appeal are as follows.

In 1976 Tomaino became a 26-percent owner of Concord Oil Company (Concord), a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Zimmerman v. BogoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. v. AntonelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. DiLuglio v. Providence Auto Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. Hendrick v. HendrickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Lawton v. NymanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Umsted v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API