Legal Opinion
Texas & N. O. R. v. Harrington
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 10, 1922No. 391PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Orange County; W. T. Danis, Judge. Suit by, Alice Harrington and others, against the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
WADKER, J.'
This case is before us again on mandate from the Supreme Court (235 S. W. 188), directing us to pass on appellant’s assignment of error challenging the verdict of the jury as being excessive. Former opinion, T. & N. O. v. Harrington, 209 S. W. 685.
Appellant’s fourteenth assignment of error raising this issue is as follows:
“The answer of the jury to question No. 9 is unsupported by the evidence, and is contrary thereto, and the evidence is insufficient to support same, and shows that the jury was controlled by bias, passion, prejudice, or some other improper motive or influence,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. DorseyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Texas & N. O. R. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Hines v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Freeman v. GrashelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Texas Consolidated Transportation Co. v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Wells v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.