Legal Opinion

Brooks Co. v. Tolman

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided January 27, 1905Published

Error to the court of common pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

This case is here by a proceeding in error.

Tolman brought suit against the Brooks Company alleging that—

“On or about the 3d day of January, 1901, D. C. Finneran, for a valuable consideration, entered into a written contract with the plaintiff;, D. H. Tolman, wherein the said D. C. Finneran agreed to sell, assign and transfer, and did thereby, sell, assign and transfer to this plaintiff all his salary due or to become due to said D. C. Finneran from the Brooks Company for the period of ten years from the date of said instrument, and which salary amounted to sixteen ($16) dollars per week, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. KincaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. State ex rel. State Bank v. HastingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Kane v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. North Ecclesiastical Society v. MatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  5. Boylen v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API