Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Moses Olivas, Jr.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2015No. 41644Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Eismann

I concur in Justice Horton’s dissent, but write simply to add the following.

Article V, § 13, of the Idaho Constitution provides in part that “[t]he legislature shall have no power to deprive the judicial department of any power or jurisdiction which rightly pertains to it as a coordinate department of the government.” “The Constitution of the State of Idaho does not specifically enumerate those powers reserved to this separate department of the government.” State v. McCoy, 94 Idaho 236, 238, 486 P.2d 247, 249 (1971). “We have previously held that the powers reserved to the several departments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. UrrabazoIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. PedrazaIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. TribeIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SarabiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API