State v. Uglem

*436Rosellini, C. J.

(dissenting) — The majority opinion contains a complete, carefully considered recitation of the pertinent facts. There is no need to restate them.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence admits the truth of the state’s evidence and 'all inferences that reasonably can be drawn therefrom. Furthermore, it requires that the evidence be interpreted most strongly against the defendant and in a light most favorable to the state. State v. Reynolds, 51 Wn.2d 830, 833, 322 P.2d 356 (1958). However, the foregoing test does not invite speculation. It only authorizes…