Blanchard v. Wolff
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Martin v. Henley, 13 Mo. 312 ; Nor veil v. Porter, 62 Mo. 310 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; Carver v. Thornhill, 53 Mo. 283; ■Lancaster v. Insurance Co., 62 Mo. 127. cited: Helm v. Bassett, 9 Mo. 52; Brill v. Meelc, 20 Mo. 358; Gilstrap v. Felts, 50 Mo. 428 ; Hill, on New Tr. 649.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
This suit was instituted in November, 1872, for an *201alleged unlawful convei’sion of personal property. Issues were made up upon petition, answer, and reply; and the cause coming on for trial before a jury, the plaintiff, at the close of his testimony, took a nonsuit, with leave to move to set the same aside. The bill of exceptions states as follows: “The plaintiff, within three days after taking the nonsuit aforesaid, filed a motion to set the same aside and for a new trial; which motion the court thereafter overruled.” The motion is not set out, nor does any other entry relating to it appear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilstrap v. FeltsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
- Hill v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1835
- Martin v. HenleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
- Johnson v. StraderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1833
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Halsey v. MeinrathMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
- Rickroad v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Carr v. DawesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Edwards v. AlbrechtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890