Legal Opinion

Hill v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 15, 1835PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ON MOTION for a mandamus to St. Louis circuit court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court delivered by

Wash, J.

Wilkins brought an action of assumpsit on a promissory note against Hill in the circuit court, in which action a verdict was rendered for'Hill at the March term 1833; a motion was then made for a new trial which was kept under advisement until the November term 1833, and was then granted; on the second trial of the cause at the March term 1834, a verdict was again rendered for Hill and a new trial’was again moved for and granted! Whereupon *87the defendant Hill moved the court to set aside the award of a new trial and enter up judgment in accordance with…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Iron Mountain Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dickey v. MalechiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1839
  4. State ex rel. Albers v. HornerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Leahey v. DugdaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API