Legal Opinion

Jahn v. Kinderman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 26, 2004No. 1-02-2335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

Under the Business Corporation Act, frozen-out minority shareholders in closely held corporations may seek dissolution of the entity, and majority shareholders may avoid this result via a buyout of the minority at a “fair value” to be determined by the circuit court if the sides are unable to reach an agreement on the terms of sale. The instant matter results from such a buyout, and both the selling minority and the purchasing majority appeal: the sellers claim that they were entitled to prejudgment and postjudgment interest on the purchase price and that they should still be entitled to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Insureone Independent Insurance v. HallbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Brown v. Arp and Hammond Hardware CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. PPM Finance, Inc. v. Norandal USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. 7-Eleven, Inc. v. DarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. 7-Eleven, Inc. v. DarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API