Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Albert Piccone v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1969No. 352-62Published

1ConcurrenceNichols, Judge

I concur in all the points of Judge DAVIS’s opinion. However, it reaches its destination without considering, except obliquely, a matter the parties briefed and argued at length. I would prefer to deal with that issue head on, and hereby do so.

Our commissioner, in his report to the court, stated that the Federal Personnel Manual and the Naval Civilian Personnel Instructions were not introduced in’ evidence during the trial but that judicial notice was taken of them. Referring to certain provisions of the former, he relied on them to show that the action of the Navy was premature and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Michael G. Heffron v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Arthur B. Daub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Arthur H. Nordstrom v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API