Legal Opinion
Krauss v. United States
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 5, 1943No. Civil Actions Nos. 475, 476PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAILLOUET, District Judge.
The record of each of the abovementioned two causes contains a comprehensive stipulation upon which (other than the restricted testimony of one witness relating to a few comparatively unimportant facts, existence of which is not denied) this Court is to render decision.
Said stipulation provided (subject, however, to the approval of the Court) for the consolidation of the two causes for trial but not for entry of judgment. Accordingly, the trial had, was of both causes.
In the first case, Frederick Krauss seeks an aggregate refund of $8,900.02, with 6% per annum…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Edwards v. SlocumSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Helvering v. SalvageSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Krauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944