Legal Opinion

Ailes v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided November 25, 1997No. 96-1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUITINK, Judge.

Ailes appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his application for post-convietion relief. We affirm.

I.Background Facts and Proceedings.

Ailes was charged with first-degree burglary and second-degree robbery in April 1994. Prior to trial, the State offered to dismiss the burglary charge in exchange for Ailes’ guilty plea to robbery. Ailes’ lawyer wrote Ailes informing him of the State’s terms and probable sentencing consequences of the plea bargain. Counsel told Ailes robbery was a forcible felony and because he was ineligible for probation or parole he would serve a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Stanford v. Iowa State ReformatorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Bledsoe v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Munz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bugley v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Larry Dean Boring, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
  3. Reginald Sallis, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API