Legal Opinion

Johnson Tire Service, Inc. v. Thorn, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1980No. 16625PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff initiated this action to recover the balance owing for tires purchased by defendant on open account, together with interest and attorneys’ fees. The trial court awarded summary judgment for the balance of the account, plus accrued interest, but denied any recovery of attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff appeals that denial, and defendant cross-appeals, challenging the award of interest.

Plaintiff and defendant are “merchants” within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code, 1 plaintiff being engaged in the business of tire sales, and defendant in the ready-mix concrete…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Doughboy Industries Inc. & Pantasote Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. Greater Park City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bossier Bank & Trust Company v. Union Planters National Bank Of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Comark Merchandising, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Highland Group, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. F. D. McKendall Lumber Co. v. KalianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  3. Atchison County Farmers Union Co-Op Ass'n v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Maxon Corp. v. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Rocheux International of New Jersey, Inc. v. U.S. Merchants Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API