Legal Opinion

Brodhead v. Dodgin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1992No. 3-90-129-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDD, Justice.

Donald and Peggy Dodgin (the Dodgins) brought this suit against Eugene Brod-head, receiver for Mission National Insurance Company (the Receiver), to recover the maximum $100,000 per-person limit provided under the Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Act (The Guaranty Fund). Tex.Ins.Code Ann. art. 21.28-C (1981 & Supp.1991). Following a jury verdict and district court judgment favorable to the Dodgins, the Receiver files this appeal.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This lawsuit is a sign of the economic times in Texas. On June 16, 1983, the Dodgins received serious,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Northwest Mall, Inc. v. Lubri-Lon International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Hammond v. StricklenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Durish v. Channelview BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Franklin v. DonohoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Johnson v. J. Hiram Moore, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Texas Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Boy Scouts of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  2. Pool v. DurishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Stone v. Kentucky Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  4. Charles Ray Horton v. State Department of Insurance Receiver J. Robert Hunter and Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. David Lloyd Esau v. Carlos J. Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API