Legal Opinion

Neidigh v. Select Specialty Hospital-McKeesport

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-576PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge

For the reasons that follow, the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) filed by Select Specialty Hospital — McKeesport (“Defendant”) will be GRANTED.

I. MEMORANDUM

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant seeks judgment as' a matter of law with respect to all claims asserted in the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 18 (“the Complaint” or “Compl.”)) filed by Katie Neidigh : (“Plaintiff’) on September 29, 2014. Plaintiff claims that she was terminated due to her pregnancy in violation of Title VII of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. ABRAHAM v. BRENNANDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. AVERYTT v. MAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITAL OF UPMCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. ROSS-TIGGETT v. REED SMITH, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API