H-W Technology, LC v. Overstock.com. Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge.
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the plaintiffs objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.
While the court agrees with the recommendation of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- H-W Technology, L.C. v. overstock.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool and ManufacturingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Sequoia Technology, LLC v. Dell, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020