Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Texaco Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1969No. Civ. No. 68-381PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The Court has under consideration Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges that the Defendant has violated the implied covenant to diligently develop the premises covered by an oil and gas lease which was entered into by Plaintiffs and Defendant on October 31, 1961, for a term of five years and as long thereafter as oil and gas is produced. One producing well on the premises holds the entire lease. There is no offset drainage and that implied covenant is not involved herein. The relief prayed for by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Southwestern Oil Co. v. McDanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Central States Production Corp. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Southwestern Oil Co. v. KerseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Superior Oil Co. v. Devon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Quintin Little v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- The Superior Oil Company v. Devon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979