Legal Opinion

Ex parte Redd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application to this court for mandamus to the Circuit Court of Pike county, to compel that court to make and enter an order subjecting personal property levied on under an execution, and claimed as exempt by the defendant in the execution, to sale, on bis failure to file an inventory as provided in section 2837 of the Code of 1876.. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J.-

— The petitioner, Redd, obtained a judgment against J. R. Mark, and under an execution issued thereon, certain personal property, of value less than one thousand *549-dollars, was levied on as the property of defendant. The defendant had filed no claim to said property, as exempt, under section 2828 of the Code of 1876. After the levy he did file such claim under section 2834 of the Code. At the tidal term the claimant of exemption failed to file an inventory, as provided in section 2837 of the Code; and thereupon the plaintiff moved the court for judgment by .default, declaring the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Pinney v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex parte HurnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Ex parte HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. State ex rel. S.N. v. W.Y.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Tonsmere & Craft v. BucklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Ex parte Seals Piano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API