Legal Opinion

Wingersky v. E. E. Gray Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBxtgg, C.J.

This is an action of tort for malicious prosecution. It is alleged in count one of the declaration that the defendant “maliciously and without probable cause” in*200stituted. a criminal complaint in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston, charging the plaintiff with receiving stolen goods, and that after hearing the plaintiff was discharged. It is alleged in the second count that the defendant maliciously and without probable cause instituted a complaint in the same court, charging the plaintiff with larceny, and that after hearing he was ordered to appear before the Superior Court, where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Dennehey v. WoodsumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Desmond v. FawcettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Morrow v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Beatty & Hyde, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Cohen v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Wynne v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Broussard v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Pilos v. First National Stores Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API