Alabama Steele & Wire Co. v. Clements
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Heard, before I-Ion. A. A. Coleman. Action by Tom E. Clements against the Alabama Steel & Wire Co. There was motion to strike bill of exceptions, because not signed in time. The evidence did not tend to support the allegations of count B. The other tendencies of the evidence are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Heard, before I-Ion. A. A. Coleman. Action by Tom E. Clements against the Alabama Steel & Wire Co. There was motion to strike bill of exceptions, because not signed in time. The evidence did not tend to support the allegations of count B. The other tendencies of the evidence are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. This cause was tried on counts B, C, and D. Count B is in the following language: “The plaintiff' claims of the defendant $30,000 damages, for that, on the 21st day of July, 1903, plaintiff was by invitation of the defendant, its…
1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.
The complaint as originally framed Avas composed of six counts. The minute entry shows the trial of the case Avas begun on the 27th day of January, 1904, and continued until the 30th day of January, on Avhich latter date the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff. It appeal's on the 27th of January the plaintiff amended the complaint by striking out the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth counts, and by adding three counts, designated as B, O, and I), respectively. There appears in. the record an instrument which purports to be an amend*265ment of tlie complaint. Tlie caption of the instrument is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BodemerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Davis v. Central Congregational Society of Jamaica PlainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Scoggins v. Atlantic & G. P. Cement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Hertz v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Southern Minerals Company v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Southern Railway Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.