State v. Garza
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Richard Lee Garza’s motion for a new trial because Garza’s counsel failed to challenge for cause or peremptorily strike Keith Adams, a juror who became the jury foreman. Because the court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
Factual and ProceduRal Background
Richard Lee Garza, a criminal defense attorney, was charged with three counts of aggravated sexual assault of his five-year-old niece. During voir dire, after explaining the nature of the charged offense, the trial judge inquired “whether…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Boyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Charles McKinley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Charles McKinley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Dietrich, Kyle CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Pedro Beltran v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020