Legal Opinion

State v. Houpt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1972No. 46,784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

Defendant appeals from a felony conviction for the sale of d-lysergic acid diethylamide, commonly called LSD, in violation of provisions of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act, (K. S. A. and K. S. A. 1971 Supp. 65-2601, et seq. [repealed, Laws of 1972, Chapter 234 (Laws of 1972, Chapter 235, amending Chapter 234)]). A jury was waived and in a trial to the court defendant admitted the drug sale but claimed entrapment as a defense.

The state’s evidence consisted primarily of the testimony of David Stolzheise, an employee of the Sedgwick County Sheriff,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. People v. GonzalesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. State v. DukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. State v. ReichenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. State v. BagemehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. State v. BrothersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API