Legal Opinion
MEDINOL LTD. v. Guidant Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 2007No. 03 Civ. 2604(SAS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Medinol sued Guidant alleging patent infringement. During the course of a jury trial, the parties resolved the dispute when Medinol granted Guidant a license to use certain Medinol patents. The parties notified the Court that they had settled the action. Calling this a “delightful piece of news” the Court directed the parties to state the terms of their settlement on the record. 1 An attorney for each side then outlined the settlement on the record and all parties agreed that the attorneys’ statements accurately expressed the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Robert J. Rule v. Brine, Inc., Also Known as W.H. Brine Company, and William H. Brine, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gates v. City of Biloxi, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024
- Hunter Carlin v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Oren Rosenshine and Amir Rosenshine v. A. Meshi Cosmetics Industries Ltd., A to Z Import Inc., and Eyal NoachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025