Legal Opinion

Marilyn Newsome v. David Shoemake

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2017No. 2016-CA-00280-SCTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00280-SCT MARILYN NEWSOME, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CONSERVATOR/CONSERVATRIX OF VICTORIA NEWSOME v. DAVID SHOEMAKE AND JOE DALE WALKER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/29/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES D. BELL TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: W. TERRELL STUBBS KRISSY CASEY NOBILE ROBERT BENTON EVANS G. ROBERT PARROTT, II DANNY ALTON DRAKE HAROLD EDWARD PIZZETTA, III WILLIAM C. BRABEC ALEXANDER FREDERICK GUIDRY LAUREN CAVALIER STUBBS MARC E. BRAND COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SIMPSON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: LAUREN CAVALIER STUBBS W. TERRELL STUBBS…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API