Sachs v. Montague Shoe Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The defendant moves, under Rule 12 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., to dismiss this action on the ground that the licensees of the plaintiff are indispensable parties to this action, and are not within the jurisdiction of the court, and for an order directing the plaintiff to file a more definite statement of the various matters alleged in the complaint.
The complaint sets forth an action for a declaratory judgment in a case alleged to be of an actual controversy involving the validity and the infringement of defendant’s United States Letters Patent No.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Skelly Oil Co. v. WickhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Galdi v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Lances v. LetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Cellulose Material Solutions, LLC v. SC Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023