Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Brien v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 11, 1978No. 77-357Published

1DissentJustice Jones

I respectfully dissent.

It is well settled that a fireman is not entitled to a pension in the first instance under either section 4 — 110 or 4 — 111 of the Illinois Pension Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 108M, pars. 4 — 110 and 4 — 111) solely by reason of the fact that he is no longer able to perform the duties of a fire fighter, but rather he must be disabled for service in the fire department in any full-time position, including fire inspector. (Peterson v. Board of Trustees, 54 Ill. 2d 260, 296 N.E.2d 721 (1973); Mulder v. Board of Trustees, 103 Ill. App. 2d 174, 242 N.E.2d 627 (1968).)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Pension FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stiles v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cohn v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Mulder v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API