Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1905No. Docket No. 30Published

Appeal from Monroe; Lockwood, J. Petition, by Mary R. Bullock and B. Ellis Bullock against James B. Bradley, auditor general, and Archie T. Miller to set aside a sale of land for taxes. From the decree rendered, petitioners and respondent Miller appeal..

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

Mr. Miller, one of the respondents,, purchased, August 20, 1904, of the auditor general, the*123E. £ of N. W. fractional quarter of section 18, township 8 S., range 7 E., containing 96 acres, and received a deed therefor, and as a condition of purchase paid to the auditor general $505.48, and upon the same date purchased and procured deed for the S. W. i of N. W. fractional quartet of section 18, township 8 S-, range 7 E., containing 48 acres, paying as a condition of purchase $251.46; both of said descriptions of land being sold to the State under a decree for the taxes delinquent for the year…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kneeland v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hand v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Berkey v. BurchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Rumsey v. GriffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API