Legal Opinion
Venmill Industries, Inc. v. ELM, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 22, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-40064-TSHPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 20) AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR DIRECTED SERVICE OF PROCESS (Docket No. 23) AND JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY (Docket No. 27)
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action in which Plaintiff Venmill Industries, Inc. seeks a declaration that it does not infringe on any valid claim of U.S. Patent No. 8,342,905. Defendant ELM, Inc., the owner of the patent, has moved to dismiss the First Amended Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process. (Docket No. 20). Plaintiff has filed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Britax Child Safety, Inc. v. Nuna Int'l B.V.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Plixer Int'l, Inc. v. Scrutinizer GMBHDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017
- Beck, M.D. v. Bronstein, M.D.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- BioNTech SE v. CureVac AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. IPCom GmbH & Co., KGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.