Legal Opinion
Eberts v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 18, 1978No. 77-2516PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Because of the rapidly evolving nature of the field, litigation directed at alleged employment discrimination based on sex continues to generate perplexing legal questions. The present appeal is founded on an effort by appellants to establish that General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125, 97 S.Ct. 401, 50 L.Ed.2d 343 (1976), does not preclude them from stating a claim based on discrimination against female employees of the Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The district court concluded that in light of Gilbert, plaintiffs’ action must be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kronfeld v. First Jersey National BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Kathleen ZICHY and Jane E. Schofer, Appellants, v. the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Arment v. Commonwealth National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Thompson v. Board of Education of the Romeo Community SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.