Legal Opinion

Wood v. Michigan Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1957No. 390PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobmaN, J.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is to the refusal of the court to allow its motion for nonsuit. On the prior appeal defendant asserted that its motion for nonsuit should be allowed. This Court held the evidence sufficient to take the case to the jury. The only reason now assigned for changing the conclusion then reached is the fact that the present case does not include the opinion evidence then held incompetent. It was held on the prior appeal that the testimony of plaintiff, as recited, sufficed to take the case to the jury. The opinion evidence was in no way made the basis for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trexler Lumber Co. v. Allemannia Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Gerhard v. Travelers Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Pearl Assur. Co. v. Stacey Bros. Gas Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co. v. SikesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Miller v. Farmers Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Sadler ex rel. SadlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  2. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. SadlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Mallet v. HuskeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Dunes Club, Inc. v. CHEROKEE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API