Legal Opinion
Pecheur Lozenge Co. v. National Candy Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 31, 1940No. 5918PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, District Judge.
The facts are:
1. The plaintiff, Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Pecheur”), is and at all times hereinafter mentioned, was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York and a citizen of said state.
2. The defendant, National Candy Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “National”), is and at all times hereinafter mentioned, was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New Jersey and a citizen of said state.
3. The plaintiff has spent money and done many things to advertize its trademark and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Le Blume Import Co. v. CotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pecheur Lozenge Co. v. National Candy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Eastern Columbia, Inc. v. WaldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Western Stove Co. v. Geo. D. Roper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949