Legal Opinion
Herbert S. Moncier v. Board of Professional Responsibility
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2013No. E2012-00340-SC-R3-BPPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNELIA A. CLARK, J„
delivered the opinion of the Court,
in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined.
An attorney suspended from the practice of law for eleven months and twenty-nine days, with all but forty-five days of the suspension probated, was assessed costs associated with the proceedings that resulted in his suspension pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section 24.3. The attorney timely filed a petition seeking relief from costs, and a panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility convened and conducted a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Board of Professional Responsibility v. ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Paul J. Walwyn v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.