Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Davis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 2011No. 96477PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary J. Boyle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Lawanda Davis, appeals from the trial court’s order granting restitution of the premises to Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (“CMHA”) on its forcible-entry-and-detainer action. She raises two assignments of error for our review:

{¶ 2} “[1] The trial court erred in granting Plaintiff-Appellee Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority’s (“CMHA”) request to evict Davis from her apartment solely on the basis that persons in her apartment possessed small quantities of marijuana, and where, in one instance, Davis did not authorize the individual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. HarrisCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Doe v. Vineyard ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Holloway v. LeechOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. MKJAS Properties, L.L.C. v. Blissful Blooms Floral, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API