Legal Opinion

South Philadelphia Builders' Supply Co. v. Testa

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided April 12, 1927No. 1721, M. L. DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Taulane, J.,

— The plaintiff, a sub-contractor, filed a mechanic’s claim. The owners move to strike it off on the ground that it does not show the kinds, quantities or prices of the materials furnished.

The claim avers: “The said sum of $331.79, being the debt contracted for lime, sand, pebbles, cement and other building supplies ... at the times and in the quantities and at the prices in the annexed bill of particulars mentioned, . . . which bill the said claimant prays may be taken and considered as part of this lien.”

No such bill of particulars is attached to the claim, and the claim nowhere…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Thirsk v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. McFarland v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Burrows v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Sumption v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API