Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Ridgley National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1904No. 13,668PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Kearny district court; William Easton Hutchison, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

The defendant in error was plaintiff below. It commenced an action in replevin in Kearny county, Kansas, against the plaintiffs in error, setting out in its petition the execution and delivery to it by the plaintiffs of their promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage on 515 head of cattle of various kinds, all branded alike. It further alleged that the note was long past due and that it was entitled to the immediate possession of the mortgaged property, and that “defendants unlawfully detain and keep plaintiff out of the possession…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Denny v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Deford v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American State Bank v. HoldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Altman v. Phillips County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Shawnee Credit Corp. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Lemaster v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API