Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Texana Oil & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1919No. 23320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application by the Texana Oil & Refining Company and. others for writs of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition against W. L. Dickinson, to prevent execution of an order of judicial sequestration.

1Opinion of the CourtProvostx, J.

The matter presently to be considered is the application of the Texana Oil & Refining Company to this court for the writs of mandamus, certiorari and prohibition to prevent the trial judge from putting into execution an order of judicial sequestration granted by him.

Noel made an oil and mineral lease to Kronenburg of a quarter of a quarter section of land. Kronenburg transferred the lease to the Romax Oil Company. This company transferred a three-quarter interest to W. L. Dickinson. The original lease and the contracts by which it was thus transferred are not in the record, and nothing is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen, West & Bush v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co. v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. State ex rel. Dowdell v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate v. DebaillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. Puckette v. HicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. CallowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Knighton v. DerryberrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Ludwig v. CallowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API