Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barela v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1990No. 89-45Published

1Concurrence

URBIGKIT, Justice,

specially concurring.

I specially concur by agreement that plain error was not presented in statements made in prosecutorial argument.

I write additionally to emphasize that counsel, not the judge, has first responsibility for deterrence of improper conduct of opposing counsel. It is the duty of the trial court to facilitate the orderly progress of the trial while maintaining the appearance of strict impartiality. United States v. Davis, 752 F.2d 963, 975 (5th Cir.1985). If objection is made, correction is immediately and more easily accomplished. Lindsey v. State, 725 P.2d…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API