Legal Opinion

Ehnes v. Weldon

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 4, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

13 N.J. Super. 23 (1951)

80 A.2d 123

FRED C. EHNES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

PHILIP J. WELDON AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 26, 1951.

Decided April 4, 1951.

Before Judges JACOBS, BIGELOW and DONGES.

Mr. Harry V. Osborne, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Osborne, Cornish & Scheck, attorneys).

The respondent did not file a brief or make an oral argument.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The appeal is before us on a very scanty agreed statement in lieu of record. Rule 1:2-22. The statement shows…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Gregory's Exrs. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Owens v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Gulick v. LoderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1832

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoppe v. RanziniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Singh v. SidanaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  3. Kentucky Dept. of Mental Health v. MullinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. ADAMAR OF NEW JERSEY, INC. v. MasonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Markham v. GottsegenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API