Legal Opinion

Smith Sturgeon & Co. v. Grosslight

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Debt by Smith, Sturgeon & Company, a corporation, against Fred L. Grosslight, principal, and Louis R. Gross-light and James D. Burns, sureties, upon a bail bond. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

In an action begun by capias, Smith, Sturgeon & Co. obtained a judgment in the Wayne circuit court against the defendant Fred L. Grosslight, who was subsequently arrested on a capias ad satisfaciendum. He, with the two other defendants, executed a bond to the jail limits to the sheriff of the county of Wayne, and was released. Afterwards, and on the 16th day of April, 1898, and while still under bail to the jail limits, on a criminal complaint made before a justice of the peace of the county of Macomb, Fred L. Grosslight was arrested in the city of Detroit by a' deputy sheriff of Macomb…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bissell v. KipNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Browne v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Beecher v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Willet v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kruse v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lessnau v. Catholic Order of ForestersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Optner v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  3. Muirhead v. BrunsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. American Surety Co. v. Van GilderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  5. Hastings v. OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API