Legal Opinion

Haygood & Cutts v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 24, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Lien foreclosure. Before Judge George. Ben Hill superior court. July 3, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. Where attorneys filed a claim of lien on certain land which had been recovered in a suit, reciting that there was a special contract that they were to have a certain undivided interest in such land in case of a recovery; and where in the proceeding to foreclose the lien they also alleged a special contract that they were to have a specified interest as a conditional fee, and the evidence in their favor tended to support this allegation, there was no error in shaping the charge to fit the case as made, and in not shaping it so as to authorize a recovery on a quantum meruit.

2. If there was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Lewis v. Van ValkenburgSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Johns v. League, Duvall & Powell Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Lewis v. Van ValkenburgSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API